Charged With Destruction of Public Property in Minneapolis: What You Should Know
By Sullivan Rice
During protests and periods of unrest in Minneapolis, people are often charged with destruction of public property. This charge is frequently used broadly and aggressively — sometimes as a way to punish protest activity rather than actual damage.
If you or someone you love is facing this charge, this guide is written for you, not the system, to explain what it really means and how to protect yourself.
What Does “Destruction of Public Property” Mean in Minnesota?
In Minnesota, destruction of public property generally involves allegations that someone:
Damaged government-owned property
Defaced buildings, vehicles, or infrastructure
Broke windows, fences, or fixtures
The key word is allegedly.
Police often file these charges based on:
Proximity, not proof
Group behavior, not individual actions
Assumptions made during chaotic situations
Being nearby is not the same as being responsible.
This Charge Is Commonly Used at Protests
In Minneapolis, destruction-of-property charges are often added when:
Police want leverage
Arrests are made in groups
Officers cannot identify who did what
These cases frequently rely on:
Limited or unclear video
Officer testimony without corroboration
Generalized claims about “the crowd”
That matters — because the law requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt against you, not the group.
What the State Must Prove
To convict you, prosecutors must show:
You personally caused damage
The property belonged to a public entity
The damage meets a specific legal threshold
If the state cannot clearly connect you to the damage, the case is weak.
Presence alone is not enough.
What to Do If You Are Arrested or Charged
If you are arrested or cited:
Do not explain yourself to police
Do not admit to being present or involved
Do not discuss the incident with others
Say:
“I am exercising my right to remain silent and I want a lawyer.”
Then stop talking.
Even statements meant to minimize involvement can be used against you.
Protest Context Matters
Context is important.
Defense arguments may include:
You were protesting peacefully
You were exercising First Amendment rights
You were not involved in property damage
Police misidentified you
You were swept up in a mass arrest
Charges tied to protest activity are often challenged — and often dismissed — when properly defended.
Immigration Consequences Can Be Serious
For non-citizens, property-related charges can carry immigration consequences — even if the damage was minor or alleged.
This makes early legal advice critical. A criminal defense strategy should consider immigration impact from the start.
Do Not Let the Charge Define You
A destruction-of-public-property charge can feel heavy — especially when it’s tied to protest or political expression. But a charge is not a conviction, and it is not a judgment of your values or intentions.
Many of these cases:
Are reduced
Are dismissed
Never go to trial
Strong defense matters.
Final Word
Destruction-of-property charges are often used to intimidate and discourage dissent. Understanding what the state must prove — and what you do not have to give them — puts power back in your hands.
