Protest-Related Charges in Minneapolis: A Defense Guide

Overcharging is common. Silence is powerful. Defense matters.
By Sullivan Rice

In Minneapolis, protest-related arrests often come with a stack of charges meant to intimidate, overwhelm, or pressure people into quick pleas. This guide breaks down some of the most common charges and tactics used against protesters — and what you should know if you’re facing them.

This is written for protesters and community members — not the state.

1. “Aiding and Abetting” at Protests

What It Is

“Aiding and abetting” means the state is claiming you helped or encouraged someone else to commit a crime.

How It’s Misused

At protests, this charge is often added when:

  • Police can’t prove who did what

  • People are arrested in groups

  • The state wants leverage without evidence

Being nearby, chanting, filming, or running is not the same as helping.

What the State Must Prove

Prosecutors must show:

  • You intentionally assisted another person

  • You knew a crime was going to occur

Association is not guilt. Presence is not proof.

2. Felony vs. Misdemeanor Property Damage in Minnesota

The Difference Matters

Property damage charges depend on:

  • The alleged dollar amount of damage

  • Whether the property is public or private

  • Prior convictions

Minor damage is often charged as a misdemeanor — but during protests, police frequently inflate damage estimates to justify felony charges.

Why This Is Important

Felony charges:

  • Increase bail

  • Increase pressure to plead

  • Carry harsher long-term consequences

Damage amounts can be challenged — and often are.

3. Video Evidence: Helpful or Harmful?

How Video Helps

Video can:

  • Show you did not cause damage

  • Contradict police reports

  • Prove misidentification or excessive force

How Video Is Used Against You

Police also use:

  • Social media clips

  • Crowd footage taken out of context

  • Grainy or partial recordings

Do not assume video tells the whole story. Context matters.

What to Do

  • Do not delete footage

  • Do not post commentary online

  • Share evidence only with your lawyer

4. Why Protest Charges Often Get Dismissed or Reduced

Many protest-related cases fall apart because:

  • Officers cannot identify individual actions

  • Evidence is weak or contradictory

  • Arrests were made without probable cause

  • Dispersal orders were unclear or unlawful

Protest cases are defense-heavy. Early legal strategy can change outcomes.

5. Expungement of Protest-Related Charges in Minnesota

Yes — It’s Often Possible

Even if you were arrested or charged, Minnesota law allows many protest-related cases to be:

  • Expunged

  • Sealed

  • Removed from public view

This can apply to:

  • Dismissed cases

  • Acquittals

  • Some convictions

Why Expungement Matters

An arrest record can affect:

  • Jobs

  • Housing

  • Education

  • Immigration status

Clearing your record is about reclaiming your future.

What to Do If You’re Charged

No matter the charge:

  • Do not talk to police

  • Do not explain your intent

  • Do not post details online

Say:

“I am exercising my right to remain silent and I want a lawyer.”

Then stop talking.

Immigration Consequences Are Real

For non-citizens, even protest-related misdemeanors can have immigration consequences.

Defense strategies should account for:

  • ICE involvement

  • Immigration holds

  • Long-term status risks

Criminal and immigration law intersect — and mistakes are costly.

Final Word

Protest charges in Minneapolis are often about control, not accountability. The law still requires proof, fairness, and respect for constitutional rights.

You do not have to accept overcharging, intimidation, or silence as the cost of speaking out.

Jack Rice Defense stands with people targeted for protest-related charges — because dissent is not a crime, and defense should never be passive.

Next
Next

Jack Rice on KARE 11: Rule of Law, Body Cameras, and the Second Amendment After Fatal ICE Shooting